PRACA KAZUISTYCZNA
Occupational contact allergy to omeprazole and ranitidine
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Clinica Creu Blanca, Barcelona, Spain
(Unit of Allergy)
2
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
(Unit of Occupational Medicine, School of Medicine)
Data publikacji online: 20-03-2017
Autor do korespondencji
Pere Sanz-Gallen
University of Barcelona, Unit of Occupational Medicine, School of Medicine,
Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2017;68(3):433-5
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibition and ranitidine is an H2 histamine receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of
gastroesophageal reflex disease, peptic ulcer disease, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and as a protector of the gastric mucosae. We report
a case of occupational contact allergy to omeprazole and ranitidine. A 48-year-old man, with no pre-existing history of atopy
or lifestyle factors. He neither had any medical history of consumption of drugs such as ranitidine and omeprazole. He worked
for 19 months in the pharmaceutical company that manufactured ranitidine base. He presented rash in the face and eczema on
the dorsum of the hands with itching. The study by prick tests with ranitidine gave negative response. Patch testing with ranitidine
base and ranitidine hydrochloride gave positive response. A month later, when the patient was asymptomatic he returned to the
pharmaceutical company, being switched from this previous job to the reactor manufacturing omeprazole. A few days after that,
he presented erythematous eruptions involving face and neck with itching. Prick tests, path tests and in vitro laboratories studies
with omeprazole gave positives. In this case the patient presented hypersensitivity type I at omeprazole and hypersensitivity
type IV at omeprazole and ranitidine. Our aportation indicates the importance of careful analysis of the occupational exposure
histories of patients with the suspected type I or type IV hypersensitivity to allergens, to determine whether work exposure is the
cause. Med Pr 2017;68(3):433–435