REVIEW PAPER
Fullerenols in therapy and diagnosis of cancer
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Łódzki / University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
(Wydział Biologii i Ochrony Środowiska, Katedra Biofizyki Molekularnej / Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection,
Department of Molecular Biophysics)
Online publication date: 2016-11-22
Corresponding author
Anita Krokosz
Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Biologii i Ochrony Środowiska,
Katedra Biofizyki Molekularnej, ul. Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Łódź
Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2016;67(6):817-31
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Malignant tumors are one of the main causes of death in Poland. One of the objectives of contemporary biomedical research is
to maximize the effects of therapeutic strategies. The actions undertaken to improve therapeutic agents are aimed at reducing the
side effects of cancer treatments. Another direction of investigations is the search for protective substances that reduce the toxicity
of the drug to normal cells. Carbon-based nanomaterials (fullerenes and their derivatives, graphene, carbon nanotubes, nanodiamonds)
are a broad class of nanoparticles that have potential biomedical applications in both therapy and diagnostics. The aim of
this paper is to review biological properties of fullerenols in the context of their use in various strategies of cancer treatments. The
authors also discuss the possibility of simultaneous use of nanoparticles in therapy and diagnosis, that is, in theranostics. Current
knowledge indicates that fullerenes and their hydrophilic derivatives, especially fullerenols, show low or no toxicity. They may
contribute to the inhibition of tumor growth and protection of normal cells through their antioxidant properties, as well as to the
regulation of expression of genes involved in apoptosis and angiogenesis, and stimulation of the immune response. Gadoliniumcontaining
endohedral fullerenes are less toxic as a contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging, and they may also inhibit
tumor growth, which is a promising result for theranostics. Med Pr 2016;67(6):817–831