REVIEW PAPER
Potential carcinogenic risk of dacarbazine exposure among healthcare workers
More details
Hide details
1
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Chemical Safety Department)
2
Gameta – Infertility Treatment Clinic, Rzgów, Poland
Online publication date: 2026-11-12
Corresponding author
Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dr med. Jerzego Nofera, Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Chemicznego, ul. Świętej Teresy od Dzieciątka Jezus 8, 91-348 Łódź
HIGHLIGHTS
- Damage to DNA was detected in lymphocytes of workers exposed to dacarbazine.
- Animal studies show dakarbazine has carcinogenic effects.
- Exposure to dakarbazine may pose risk even at low levels.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs, including dacarbazine [5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide – DTIC], has long represented a significant occupational safety issue in the healthcare sector due to their mutagenic and potentially carcinogenic properties. In Poland, according to Central Register of Exposure Data on Chemical Substances, the total number of workers occupationally exposed ryto
DTIC in 2024 was 6319. The aim of this study is to review and analyze available experimental data on the carcinogenic properties of DTIC,
obtained mainly from animal studies, in the context of assessing potential health risks for occupationally exposed individuals. A literature
review was conducted of Polish- and English-language publications up to December 2025, using Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and
Google Scholar databases. Experimental animal studies, reports from international institutions including International Agency for Research
on Cancer and the European Commission, as well as medicinal product characteristics, were analyzed. Dacarbazine demonstrates genotoxic
properties confirmed in both in vitro and in vivo animal studies. In selected biomonitoring studies of genotoxic effects in workers occupationally exposed to cytostatics, changes suggesting DNA damage have been reported; however, the available data are limited. Animal studies indicate carcinogenic effects involving multiple organs, including the lungs, mammary gland, lymphatic system, and central nervous system, as well as transplacental effects. Quantitative risk assessment models (e.g., Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Standards), based on toxicological extrapolation, indicate a relationship between exposure level and estimated model-based cancer risk (4 × 10–⁵ at an exposure concentration of 0.9 μg/m³). Dacarbazine demonstrates genotoxic and carcinogenic potential in experimental studies. Due to the absence of a clear threshold for genotoxic effects, potential health risks associated with occupational exposure cannot be excluded. The implementation of collective and personal protective measures, including closed-system drug transfer devices and environmental monitoring of workplace contamination, is essential. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2026;77(6)