REVIEW PAPER
OELs derivation in Poland and in the former Eastern Bloc with reference to approaches and practices applied in the EU
More details
Hide details
1
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine / Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. J. Nofera, Łódź, Poland
(Department of Chemical Safety / Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Chemicznego)
Corresponding author
Renata Soćko
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine,
Department of Chemical Safety, św. Teresy 8, 91-348, Łódź, Poland
Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2015;66(3):383-92
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on the literature, current legislation and the European Union (EU) directives, the rules to protect the health of workers
in Poland and the countries of the former Eastern Bloc were analyzed. Since 2002, the activities in the field of hygiene standards
in the countries of the former Eastern Bloc have been correlated with the EU policy. The functioning of the system of maximum
admissible concentrations (MAC) having been implemented in Poland for many years before the accession to the EU, has provided
for a relatively quick adjustment of Polish regulations on chemicals to the relevant European law. The Polish list includes 543 substances.
In the former Eastern Bloc countries, intensification of work after joining the EU has caused the lists in those countries to
contain from 285 substances in Slovakia to 780 in Lithuania. Currently, all substances included in the EU lists (up to and including
the 3rd list of occupational exposure limit values of the Directive 2009/161/EC) have been governed by the Polish, Lithuanian,
Czech, Latvian and Hungarian law. In Estonia and Slovakia the provisions of the Directive 2006/15/EC establishing the
second list of occupational exposure limits have been implemented. Individual national lists contain much more chemicals than
the EU list containing currently 122 substances. The legislative process in the EU is slow, and that is why the national law is important
and necessary due to the local needs in selected areas. It is necessary to correlate the activities in the field of determining
regional occupational exposure limit (OEL) values in the countries of the Eastern Bloc and the EU. Med Pr 2015;66(3):383–392